Blog for discussion posts + replies for ARTH 3560 History of Photo WWI-present (Spring 2015)
Pages
- Final Presentations
- Home
- NEW: Info + Updates!
- Syllabus / Info / Course Contract
- Schedule of Reading + Lectures
- Unplugged Classroom
- Plagiarism Tutorial + Certificate
- Sexual Violence + Title IX
- Photo + Surveillance: DUE
- Flickr
- Advertising Due
- Migrant Mother DUE
- D. Lange: Photo as Ag Sociologist
- Gladwell: Picture Problem
- Steiglitz + Camera Work
- Early Photo Processes
- The Dove Effect
- Surveillance IMAGES + READINGS
- Full Syllabus PDF download
- Study Images
- Extra Credit: Tues 3/10 Food Matters @Benton
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Richard Prince
"I never associated advertisements with having an author.'' After reading this quote by Richard Prince, although I don't necessarily agree with it, I think I now understand his work better. Although as pointed out in the article that often "there's not a pixel, there's not a grain that's different," it's less about the photograph itself & more about the concept behind it. The Marlboro man has always stood for the white American dream& that's what Marlboro has been using to sell its cigarettes. Artists like RichardPrince who "appropriate" the work of others focus on the concept rather than "making" a piece. I think its easy to dismiss this kind of work because we have been taught that originality is key but I think there is something original about artists taking another's work and making it their own. For me personally, I probably would not be happy if someone "appropriated" my work & made hundred of thousands of dollars off of it & I know many others who wouldn't be either. Like Mr. Kantz said, I think there should be some recognition to the original "author" (whether you believe them to be or not). But I don't think we should limit artists to those who "create" their own art meaning are the original authors of the piece.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment