It is clear that the post-9/11 world is
paranoid, suspicious, and has the tendency to overreact. I am not saying that America does not
have reason for these strong reactions towards recording audio and visual
scenarios, but I do believe these responses lead to some unjust
prosecutions. Referring to the
artist facing fifteen years in jail for recording his own arrest without
consent from the commanding officer doing the arresting, I believe the artist
is receiving an unjust punishment.
Granted, laws are laws; I am not disputing that. I am, however, calling attention to the
asinine use of official power to punish a street vendor illegally selling
silk-screen patches for $1. To
punish this artist not for the illegality of his product sales, but for
recording the arrest is just ridiculous.
Another example: The
recording of police misconduct.
The action of recording, itself, may be illegal, but the actions the
police are partaking in are equally as illegal, yet the videos are discarded
because they were technically illegally recorded. This just goes to show that we might be coming down harder
on the law since the 9/11 attacks, but our punishment for crime just might be
displaced.
Blog for discussion posts + replies for ARTH 3560 History of Photo WWI-present (Spring 2015)
Pages
- Final Presentations
- Home
- NEW: Info + Updates!
- Syllabus / Info / Course Contract
- Schedule of Reading + Lectures
- Unplugged Classroom
- Plagiarism Tutorial + Certificate
- Sexual Violence + Title IX
- Photo + Surveillance: DUE
- Flickr
- Advertising Due
- Migrant Mother DUE
- D. Lange: Photo as Ag Sociologist
- Gladwell: Picture Problem
- Steiglitz + Camera Work
- Early Photo Processes
- The Dove Effect
- Surveillance IMAGES + READINGS
- Full Syllabus PDF download
- Study Images
- Extra Credit: Tues 3/10 Food Matters @Benton
No comments:
Post a Comment