In “Reading
Racial Fetishism: The Photographs of Robert Mapplethorpe,” Kobena Mercer
explores the work of Robert Mapplethorpe. Mercer describes Mapplethorpe’s
subject matter “gay, S/M ritual, lady bodybuilders, black men,” as
representative of a “reworking of the old modernist tactic of “shock the
bourgeoisie.” This subject matter, with a “vaguely transgressive quality…is
given heightened allure by his evident mastery of photographic technology.”
Mercer begins to
focus on the “photographs primary [representation of] a ‘look’.” A photographs
ability to produce a ‘look,’ Mercer believes, in the case of Mapplethorpe’s Black Males, does not represent “the
individual behind the lens, but as a cultural artifact that says something
about certain ways in which white people “look” at black people and how in this
way of looking, black male sexuality is perceived as something different,
excessive, Other.”
This idea of the
perception, by white people of black people, references earlier art historical
representation in art of the “Other” or the orient during the 19th
century. Also, interestingly, the general representation of the other in this manner
was often portrayed in a heightened sexual manner.
During the 19th
century, it was often through the gaze of the male artist the orient way
depicted through the female nude. This representation of the female other
often, unfairly, fabricated the orient as weak, and vulnerable in comparison to
the powerful, and dominating west.
This
representation through the guise of the male artist recalls to me the notion of
the photograph as representative of the ‘look’. Mapplethorpe’s photograph,
according to Mercer, function as a representation of the way in which white
people sees black people, not necessarily how they truly are.
No comments:
Post a Comment