Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s word on the Daguerreotype was
quite interesting to me. I love to hear
of first hand accounts of moments in history. She spoke so highly of this new invention and
how she could have in image of someone forever. The idea of having this photograph of a loved
one rather than a painting made by the “noblest Artist” is quite radical in
this time. Paintings were highly
regarded, but Browning doesn’t care. She
wants a daguerreotype and could care less about paintings. A painting could show someone’s likeness, but
Browning states that “the very shadow of a person” in a daguerreotype gives it
a sense of realism and how this new invention will overtake the portrait world.
If I were living in the early
daguerreotype world, I too, would think it would take over portraits. Although a sitter must be still for up to 10
minutes, it is much easier and faster to take a daguerreotype than have an oil
painting done. Overall, Browning’s short
account on daguerreotypes was fascinating and her interest in this new
invention shows in her writings.
Blog for discussion posts + replies for ARTH 3560 History of Photo WWI-present (Spring 2015)
Pages
- Final Presentations
- Home
- NEW: Info + Updates!
- Syllabus / Info / Course Contract
- Schedule of Reading + Lectures
- Unplugged Classroom
- Plagiarism Tutorial + Certificate
- Sexual Violence + Title IX
- Photo + Surveillance: DUE
- Flickr
- Advertising Due
- Migrant Mother DUE
- D. Lange: Photo as Ag Sociologist
- Gladwell: Picture Problem
- Steiglitz + Camera Work
- Early Photo Processes
- The Dove Effect
- Surveillance IMAGES + READINGS
- Full Syllabus PDF download
- Study Images
- Extra Credit: Tues 3/10 Food Matters @Benton
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment