Dorothea Lange was hired as part of
the farm security administration to take document photos of people in rural
environments. Migrant Mother was one of the photos she took and happens to be the
most reproduced image in history of photography. The reproductions come from Lange’s publications as well as
many documentary publications.
Something I learned while reading
this is that there were four other photos taken but migrant mother was the chosen
to represent them all. What is so
different about Migrant Mother is
that it excludes context of location and time because it does not detail the
background at all, where as the other photos give context to migrant mothers
life by providing a backdrop. This
picture without much context has been seen as the universal symbol to motherhood, poverty and
survival.
Something that struck my attention
was that Lange was quoted saying “we were after the truth, not just making
effective pictures.” I found this
interesting because Lange also barely spoke with the women and did not ask her
name or for any historical information on her except her age. This is controversial because how is
she going to find any truth without interviewing her subjects. This creates a situation where the
photograph is speaking as the truth rather than an interview speaking for the
truth. This is where the power of
photography has become very apparent in history and people tend to believe
anything in a photograph, especially if it is labeled as a documentary
photograph. This is inaccurate because
she admits to editing a thumb out of the picture. Wells states that one principle of documentary photography
was that it should be untouched, so that its veracity and genuineness can be
maintained. This is not true for
this because of the edit. The
photograph was also out of Lange’s control at some point because she was being
contracted by the F.S.A. This also
makes it hard to believe that the authenticity of the photograph was being
maintained.
Another
issue I have with this photograph is that Lange thought the woman really helped
her with capturing the photograph as if it was going to help the woman out. This also proved to be false because in
an interview fifty years later the woman, Florence Owens Thompson, said she was
proud to be in the photo but she had never received any money for it. I feel like this objectifies her as a
movement and that it is unfair that she received no benefits or even notice
that she was becoming famous.
Especially since her fame came from how poor and not well off she
was.
3 comments:
I agree with you in doubting the truthfulness that the photograph tells as a documentary photo due to her lack of information about the subject. However, I don't see how editing the thumb out of the photograph demises its credibility as a documentary photograph because I don't think that the thumb would have contributed to the photograph in any way, positive or negative.
Also, you made a good point about objectifying the mother as a symbol for a movement. She should have received some form of payment.
I agree with nick. Editing the thumb out of the photograph out the photo demises the credibility as a documentary photograph because the thumb is not needed. It is not part of the event in any way.
Post a Comment