Surveillance art was a very interesting subject to learn
about. Before this class never realized how much a person was scene on a camera
per day. Are Cameras the New Guns by Kyle VanHemert raises some interesting
points? Never really thought about taking photos in a public space could lead
to being arrested. Also, never new there was a surveillance law. In addition I
learned in some cases you need consent to be on camera. In the case the man was
found guilty for the recording. If the cop was the one recording would it still
have the same out come? Most likely not because if a cop gets arrested people
will lose trust in law enforcement. This is a pretty huge double standard.
Also, seems strange that you can receive 4 to 15 years in prison for a photo. 15
years is a long time for something so simple. That is longer than some arrests
for something more serious. If you take a photo of something and a cop so
happens to walk through the photo can you be arrested for that? People should
be able to take photos of things in a public space. Surveillance photos can be
very interesting. For instance candid street photography you take photos of
what is actually going on. People are not acting differently because they do
not know there is a camera around. Surveillance art was a very cool subject I
never thought about before.
Blog for discussion posts + replies for ARTH 3560 History of Photo WWI-present (Spring 2015)
Pages
- Final Presentations
- Home
- NEW: Info + Updates!
- Syllabus / Info / Course Contract
- Schedule of Reading + Lectures
- Unplugged Classroom
- Plagiarism Tutorial + Certificate
- Sexual Violence + Title IX
- Photo + Surveillance: DUE
- Flickr
- Advertising Due
- Migrant Mother DUE
- D. Lange: Photo as Ag Sociologist
- Gladwell: Picture Problem
- Steiglitz + Camera Work
- Early Photo Processes
- The Dove Effect
- Surveillance IMAGES + READINGS
- Full Syllabus PDF download
- Study Images
- Extra Credit: Tues 3/10 Food Matters @Benton
No comments:
Post a Comment