Kasia Thomas
I am very interested in memory, even outside the context
of our classroom. Memory is strange and almost surreal concept to me — we just
hold onto these events in our mind, allowing them fade from forgetting or live
on through recollection. Memory is also very fickle. Our memories age and escape
us, decaying in the back of our minds, like an unattended book. I enjoyed this reading
because it examined our memory. It looks at not only our personal thoughts, but
also our collective memory — the memories we share as a culture and as members
of the contemporary world.
What better an example on tapping into the power of personal
and collective memories than the 9/11 Tragedy? It was an event that lives on
with everyone who was there — from small school children like myself, who
witnessed the event on the rolling televisions of my elementary school, to the
inhabitants of the lower Manhattan who were physically and psychologically
affected by the event. The reach of the event is broad and overarching.
While reading this, I enjoyed thinking about the
censorship that came about out of sensitivity to the tragedy, like “re-doing”
the Spiderman poster or pulling Hollywood projects from production. What
interested me the most, however, was the connection I made between this article
and the documentary “The Woman Who Wasn’t There”.
I saw this film a long time ago, but the documentary
focuses on the claims of a woman known to be Tania Head (who is later revealed
to be named Alicia Esteve Head). Head claimed to be a survivor of the 9/11
attacks and eventually became president of the World Trade Center Survivors’
Network; however, in 2007, it was found that her whole story was a hoax — she
had manipulated the memories of many survivors to include herself in their
recollections, when in reality she was attending college in Barcelona during
the times of the attacks. She was featured in many articles and interviews and
became a tour guide at Ground Zero, reaching a sort of celebrity status among
New Yorkers, until she was outted by the New York Times.
What interests me most about this documentary and about
the reading is that often times we feel that in instances of importance, such
as tragedy, that our memory and recollection of those events is infallible. In
general, we have experienced a traumatic experience and, as a result, we may
never forget that, and, yet, so easily we are tricked by ourselves, other
people, or the media into thinking otherwise.
1 comment:
Reading what you've said about 'The Woman Who Wasn't There' makes me think of all the people in the world who will fake being or having something in order to get attention. The biggest one of those that comes to my mind and that I see getting criticism most often is that of stolen valor, or those claiming to have been in the military and served in a combat zone when in reality they probably never left their living room. I will never understand why people feel the need to go to such lengths such as making up a story to get attention or feel special.
Post a Comment