In Franklin’s “From Realism to Virtual Reality: Images of
America’s Wars” he explains the development of war technology and the
development of the expression of war through art. Franklin notes, “prior to the
Civil War, visual images of America’s wars were, almost without exception,
expressions of romanticism and nationalism.” “Literature,” Franklin explains,
“was the only art form capable of projecting that action of warfare as temporal
flow and movements.” As photo technology grew, as did the ability of art
to capture the reality of warfare. I find it interesting how Franklin explains
the way in which the same industrial processes and scientific knowledge used to
advance war technology, is the “new means of perceiving its devastation.”
Furthermore, Franklin explains how “earlier visual arts were now radically
threatened by images of warfare introduced by photography.” It’s interesting that he refers to
photography as a “threat,.” I feel a common idea about photography is it acts as some sort of challenge to the more traditional mediums such as painting. I find
this interesting because, while it seems painting and photography are often
compared, this is somewhat of an unfair comparison since the two mediums are
completely different.
Blog for discussion posts + replies for ARTH 3560 History of Photo WWI-present (Spring 2015)
Pages
- Final Presentations
- Home
- NEW: Info + Updates!
- Syllabus / Info / Course Contract
- Schedule of Reading + Lectures
- Unplugged Classroom
- Plagiarism Tutorial + Certificate
- Sexual Violence + Title IX
- Photo + Surveillance: DUE
- Flickr
- Advertising Due
- Migrant Mother DUE
- D. Lange: Photo as Ag Sociologist
- Gladwell: Picture Problem
- Steiglitz + Camera Work
- Early Photo Processes
- The Dove Effect
- Surveillance IMAGES + READINGS
- Full Syllabus PDF download
- Study Images
- Extra Credit: Tues 3/10 Food Matters @Benton
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment